Children and parents' perspectives on the acceptability of three management strategies for dental caries in primary teeth within the 'Filling Children's Teeth: Indicated or Not' (FiCTION) randomised controlled trial - a qualitative study.
Author | |
---|---|
Abstract | :
The Filling Children's Teeth: Indicated Or Not? (FiCTION) randomised controlled trial (RCT) aimed to explore the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of managing dental caries in children's primary teeth. The trial compared three management strategies: conventional caries management with best practice prevention (C + P), biological management with best practice prevention (B + P) and best practice prevention alone (PA)-based approaches. Recently, the concept of treatment acceptability has gained attention and attempts have been made to provide a conceptual definition, however this has mainly focused on adults. Recognising the importance of evaluating the acceptability of interventions in addition to their effectiveness, particularly for multi-component complex interventions, the trial design included a qualitative component. The aim of this component was to explore the acceptability of the three strategies from the perspectives of the child participants and their parents. |
Year of Publication | :
2020
|
Journal | :
BMC oral health
|
Volume | :
20
|
Issue | :
1
|
Number of Pages | :
69
|
Date Published | :
2020
|
URL | :
https://bmcoralhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12903-020-1060-6
|
DOI | :
10.1186/s12903-020-1060-6
|
Short Title | :
BMC Oral Health
|
Download citation |